BENCHMARK REPORT

Can I Run Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT?

Comprehensive technical verdict based on static weights, dynamic KV Cache (8k baseline context window), and CUDA runtime overhead.

Official Verdict
NO — CUDA OOM

Executive Hardware Compatibility Summary: Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Authoritative verdict, memory allocation, and token generation performance:

Direct Answer: CUDA OOM — Deficit of 32.9 GBQwen 2.5 72B Instruct exceeds dedicated physical VRAM and triggers PCIe layer offloading on AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT (16GB). At standard Q4_K_M 4-bit quantization and an 8,192-token context window, total memory demand is 48.87 GB (44.27 GB weights + 2.65 GB dynamic KV cache + 1.15 GB OS & CUDA buffers). Physical VRAM is exceeded by 32.87 GB, forcing 60 transformer layers to offload across the PCIe bus to host DDR RAM. Estimated generation throughput is ~1.2 tokens/sec (~833.3 ms per token) with prompt prefill processing reaching ~214 tok/s.
Run Verdict
CUDA OOM (Offload)
Total Required VRAM
48.87 GB / 16 GB
Decoding Speed
~1.2 tok/s (833.3ms)
Safe Context Window
Offload to RAM

Hardware Architecture & VRAM Topology

RDNA 3

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT • 624 GB/s Bandwidth

Token Generation
~1.2 tok/s(833.3 ms)
OOM SPILL
VRAM Utilization Breakdown48.87 GB / 16 GB (250%)
VRAM Limit (16G)
44.27G
-32.87G Spill
Weights
44.27 GB
KV Cache
2.65 GB
Activation
0.8 GB
OS/Driver
1.15 GB
Overflow
32.87 GB
Hardware Chokepoint: PCIe Bus Throttling Active
GPU VRAM (16 GB)
20 / 80 Layers Loaded
624 GB/s Bus
PCIe 4.0 x16 Bottleneck
31.5 GB/s
-97% Bandwidth Drop
Host DDR5 System RAM
60 Layers Offloaded
+38.2 GB RAM Siphoned

Why does your generation speed collapse to ~1.2 tok/s? Because for every single generated token, model weights across the 60 offloaded layers must be transferred across the 31.5 GB/s PCIe slot from host system RAM.

Context Window vs VRAM Scaling Curve

16G VRAM Limit2k46.89G4k47.55G8k48.87G16k51.52G32k56.82G64k67.42G128k88.62G0G16G
Blue line indicates total VRAM demand across context lengths; Red dashed line is physical VRAM ceiling.

CUDA OOM — Deficit of 32.9 GB

oom

60/80 layers will spill to CPU RAM, causing severe PCIe bandwidth throttling (est. 1.2 tok/s).

Throughput
~1.2 tok/s
833.3 ms / token
Headroom
-32.87 GB
250% of capacity
Layers Fit
20 / 80
60 on DDR5
Max Safe Ctx
0
Tokens before OOM
Host DDR RAM Status:EXCEEDS SYSTEM RAM (38.2 GB required > 32 GB RAM)!
Static Permalink:/can-i-run/qwen-2-5-72b-instruct-on-rx-7800-xt
Open Static Report

Ready-to-Run CLI Commands

# Note: Model requires CPU offloading (20/80 layers on GPU)
ollama run qwen2.5:72b

Commands include automatic memory ceiling flags and model layer offload configurations calculated above.

Cloud Hardware Failover
gpuy.dev On-Demand Compute

Don't spend $2,000+ on hardware — Deploy Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct in 60s

Your local AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is missing 32.87 GB of VRAM. Running on CPU RAM throttles speeds to ~1.2 tok/s. Spin up a cloud instance starting from $1.49/hr.

46x Faster Speed
$1.49/hr
Breakeven: ~6,376 hrs vs hardware purchase
Per-second billing
Launch Cloud Node →Pre-configured environment

Hardware Specification Summary

GPU ArchitectureRDNA 3
Memory Bandwidth624 GB/s
Model Parameters72.7B (LLM)
Attention ArchitectureGrouped-Query (GQA)
Prompt Prefill Speed~214 tok/s (TTFT ~38280ms)
Benchmark Context Tested8,192 tokens
Customize in Full Matcher Simulator →

Global Compatibility Matrix for AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Evaluated at Standard Q4_K_M Precision with 8,192 Tokens Context Window

Compatibility Index
61% (35/57)
33 Pass2 Tight22 OOM
Model & ArchitectureCategoryParametersRequired VRAMFit StatusEst. SpeedSimulate
DeepSeek-R1 (671B Full MoE)MLAMoE
DeepSeek
MoE671B(37B active)
411.16 GB
OOM (-395.16G)~0.6 tok/sSimulate
DeepSeek-V3 (671B Base/Chat)MLAMoE
DeepSeek
MoE671B(37B active)
411.16 GB
OOM (-395.16G)~0.6 tok/sSimulate
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B
DeepSeek
LLM70.6B
47.6 GB
OOM (-31.6G)~1.3 tok/sSimulate
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B
DeepSeek
LLM32.8B
23.75 GB
OOM (-7.75G)~6.2 tok/sSimulate
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
DeepSeek
LLM14.7B
11.94 GB
100% VRAM Fit~48.8 tok/sSimulate
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
DeepSeek
LLM8B
7.33 GB
100% VRAM Fit~89.7 tok/sSimulate
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-8B
DeepSeek
LLM8.03B
7.48 GB
100% VRAM Fit~89.3 tok/sSimulate
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B
DeepSeek
LLM7.6B
6.49 GB
100% VRAM Fit~94.4 tok/sSimulate
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B
DeepSeek
LLM1.8B
2.61 GB
100% VRAM Fit~180 tok/sSimulate
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Lite (16B / 2.4B MoE)MLAMoE
DeepSeek
MoE15.7B(2.4B active)
11.21 GB
100% VRAM Fit~180 tok/sSimulate
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 (236B / 21B MoE)MLAMoE
DeepSeek
MoE236B(21B active)
146.23 GB
OOM (-130.23G)~1.7 tok/sSimulate
Qwen 2.5 Coder 72B Instruct
Qwen
LLM72.7B
48.87 GB
OOM (-32.87G)~1.2 tok/sSimulate
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen
LLM72.7B
48.87 GB
OOM (-32.87G)~1.2 tok/sSimulate
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision Flagship)
Qwen
LLM72.7B
48.87 GB
OOM (-32.87G)~1.2 tok/sSimulate
Qwen 2.5 VL 7B (Vision)
Qwen
LLM7.61B
6.5 GB
100% VRAM Fit~94.2 tok/sSimulate
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Qwen
LLM32.8B
23.75 GB
OOM (-7.75G)~6.2 tok/sSimulate
Qwen 2.5 Coder 14B Instruct
Qwen
LLM14.7B
11.94 GB
100% VRAM Fit~48.8 tok/sSimulate
Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B Instruct
Qwen
LLM7.6B
6.49 GB
100% VRAM Fit~94.4 tok/sSimulate
Qwen 2.5 Coder 1.5B Instruct
Qwen
LLM1.54B
2.45 GB
100% VRAM Fit~180 tok/sSimulate
Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct
Qwen
LLM32.8B
23.75 GB
OOM (-7.75G)~6.2 tok/sSimulate
Qwen 2.5 14B Instruct
Qwen
LLM14.7B
11.94 GB
100% VRAM Fit~48.8 tok/sSimulate
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct
Qwen
LLM7.6B
6.49 GB
100% VRAM Fit~94.4 tok/sSimulate
Qwen 2.5 3B Instruct
Qwen
LLM3.1B
3.59 GB
100% VRAM Fit~180 tok/sSimulate
Qwen 2.5 0.5B Instruct
Qwen
LLM0.49B
1.8 GB
100% VRAM Fit~180 tok/sSimulate
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama
LLM70.6B
47.6 GB
OOM (-31.6G)~1.3 tok/sSimulate
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Llama
LLM70.6B
47.6 GB
OOM (-31.6G)~1.3 tok/sSimulate
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Llama
LLM405B
252.77 GB
OOM (-236.77G)~0.6 tok/sSimulate
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama
LLM8B
7.33 GB
100% VRAM Fit~89.7 tok/sSimulate
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Llama
LLM3.2B
4.28 GB
100% VRAM Fit~180 tok/sSimulate
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Llama
LLM1.23B
2.41 GB
100% VRAM Fit~180 tok/sSimulate
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Llama
LLM10.6B
8.92 GB
100% VRAM Fit~67.7 tok/sSimulate
Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct
Llama
LLM89B
59.46 GB
OOM (-43.46G)~0.8 tok/sSimulate
Microsoft Phi-4 (14B)
Phi
LLM14.7B
12.01 GB
100% VRAM Fit~48.8 tok/sSimulate
Microsoft Phi-3.5 Mini (3.8B)
Phi
LLM3.82B
6.91 GB
100% VRAM Fit~180 tok/sSimulate
Google Gemma 2 9B Instruct
Gemma
LLM9.2B
9.79 GB
100% VRAM Fit~78 tok/sSimulate
Mistral Small 3 (24B Instruct)
Mistral
LLM24B
18.12 GB
OOM (-2.12G)~11.5 tok/sSimulate
Mistral NeMo (12B Instruct)
Mistral
LLM12.2B
10.15 GB
100% VRAM Fit~58.8 tok/sSimulate
Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3
Mistral
LLM7.25B
6.88 GB
100% VRAM Fit~98.9 tok/sSimulate
Codestral 22B (Mistral AI)
Mistral
LLM22.2B
17.02 GB
OOM (-1.02G)~13.5 tok/sSimulate
Mistral Large 2 (123B)
Mistral
LLM123B
79.77 GB
OOM (-63.77G)~0.6 tok/sSimulate
Mixtral 8x7B (MoE 47B)MoE
Mistral
MoE46.7B(12.9B active)
31.15 GB
OOM (-15.15G)~11.5 tok/sSimulate
Mixtral 8x22B (MoE 141B)MoE
Mistral
MoE141B(39B active)
89.67 GB
OOM (-73.67G)~1.2 tok/sSimulate
Pixtral 12B (Multimodal)
Mistral
LLM12.4B
10.28 GB
100% VRAM Fit~57.8 tok/sSimulate
Gemma 2 27B Instruct
Gemma
LLM27.2B
21.26 GB
OOM (-5.26G)~8.2 tok/sSimulate
Google Gemma 2 2B Instruct
Gemma
LLM2.6B
3.84 GB
100% VRAM Fit~180 tok/sSimulate
GLM-4 9B Chat (Zhipu AI)
GLM
LLM9.4B
7.79 GB
100% VRAM Fit~76.3 tok/sSimulate
FLUX.1 [dev] (12B DiT)
FLUX
ImageGen12B
15.68 GB
Tight Fit~59.8 tok/sSimulate
FLUX.1 [schnell] (4-step)
FLUX
ImageGen12B
15.68 GB
Tight Fit~59.8 tok/sSimulate
Stable Diffusion XL (SDXL 1.0)
SDXL
ImageGen3.5B
7.51 GB
100% VRAM Fit~180 tok/sSimulate
Stable Diffusion 1.5 (Classic)
SD
ImageGen1B
5.78 GB
100% VRAM Fit~180 tok/sSimulate
Whisper Large v3 (1.5B)
Whisper
Audio1.5B
3.64 GB
100% VRAM Fit~180 tok/sSimulate
Kokoro 82M (Text-to-Speech)
Kokoro
Audio0.082B
1.56 GB
100% VRAM Fit~180 tok/sSimulate
Wan2.1 (14B Text-to-Video)
Wan
ImageGen14.2B
18.72 GB
OOM (-2.72G)~18.6 tok/sSimulate
Wan2.1 (1.3B Video)
Wan
ImageGen1.3B
7.28 GB
100% VRAM Fit~180 tok/sSimulate
HunyuanVideo (13B Video DiT)
Hunyuan
ImageGen13B
19.69 GB
OOM (-3.69G)~18.6 tok/sSimulate
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large (8B)
SD
ImageGen8.1B
13.3 GB
100% VRAM Fit~88.5 tok/sSimulate
BAAI BGE-M3 (Multilingual Embedding)
BAAI
LLM0.56B
2.54 GB
100% VRAM Fit~180 tok/sSimulate

Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct Context Scaling Matrix on AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Dynamic KV Cache footprint and generation throughput measured across sequence lengths (Q4_K_M weights):

Context WindowKV Cache MemoryTotal VRAM DemandCompatibility StatusOffloaded LayersEst. Generation Speed
2,048 tokens (2k)0.66 GB46.89 GB / 16 GBCUDA OOM56 layers on RAM~1.4 tok/s
4,096 tokens (4k)1.33 GB47.55 GB / 16 GBCUDA OOM58 layers on RAM~1.3 tok/s
8,192 tokens (8k)Standard Baseline2.65 GB48.87 GB / 16 GBCUDA OOM60 layers on RAM~1.2 tok/s
16,384 tokens (16k)5.30 GB51.52 GB / 16 GBCUDA OOM65 layers on RAM~0.9 tok/s
32,768 tokens (32k)10.60 GB56.82 GB / 16 GBCUDA OOM74 layers on RAM~0.6 tok/s

Hardware Compatibility Q&A: Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct on AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Technical answers for memory allocation, CUDA overhead, and execution parameters.

Can AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT run Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct?
CUDA OOM — Deficit of 32.9 GB. 60/80 layers will spill to CPU RAM, causing severe PCIe bandwidth throttling (est. 1.2 tok/s). At an 8k context window, total VRAM demand is 48.87 GB compared to AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT's 16 GB frame buffer.
How much VRAM does Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct require?
At standard Q4_K_M quantization and 8k context, Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct requires approximately 48.87 GB of VRAM. This includes 44.27 GB for model weights, 2.65 GB for dynamic KV cache (Grouped-Query Attention (GQA)), 0.8 GB for activation buffers, and 1.15 GB for OS display and CUDA runtime overhead.
What generation speed (tokens/sec) can I expect on AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT?
Estimated autoregressive token generation speed is ~1.2 tokens per second with a per-token latency of ~833.3 ms, powered by 624 GB/s memory bandwidth. Prompt prefill processing reaches ~214 tok/s (TTFT ~38280 ms).
What causes CUDA Out-of-Memory (OOM) when running Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct?
CUDA OOM occurs when total memory consumption exceeds AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT's 16 GB physical VRAM. While model weights stay static, the KV cache grows with every conversation token. When VRAM fills up, inference engines (like Ollama or llama.cpp) must offload remaining layers across the PCIe bus (31.5 GB/s) to host system RAM, causing generation speed to drop sharply.
How do I run Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct locally on AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT?
You can run Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct directly with Ollama using "ollama run qwen-2-5-72b-instruct". For advanced serving with vLLM or llama.cpp, copy the ready-to-run CLI commands in the CLI Commands section above with optimal context, quantization, and GPU layer offload parameters.

Related Hardware Benchmarks & Model Alternatives

Compare Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT against alternative configurations:

Recommended Alternative GPUs for Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct

Explore how Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct performs across other budget, midrange, and flagship architectures:

Other Popular Models You Can Run on AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Verified open-weights LLMs and image models that fit within AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT's 16GB VRAM:

Dual GPU Showdown: AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Compare memory bandwidth (624 GB/s vs 1008 GB/s), VRAM headroom (16GB vs 24GB), and inference speed head-to-head.

Launch Showdown Arena

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Model weights are only one part of total VRAM consumption. When you prompt a model, the KV Cache (Key-Value Cache) stores all historical tokens. At 32k or 64k context, standard GQA attention can demand an additional 4GB to 12GB of VRAM! Combined with activation buffers and OS background consumption (0.8GB on Windows), total memory spikes beyond hardware capacity.